Psychological safety – what is it and why you should care

Post by 
Harry Vazanias
Published 
May 14, 2019
T

he term Psychological Safety was coined by Amy Edmondson in 1999 after a study she was involved in unearthed an interesting surprise. Researching mistakes by medical teams in the US, she discovered that the teams seen as the high performers were the ones with the highest mistakes, and in turn, the lower performers had the least. On further analysis she discovered that the high performing teams had a culture of transparency and trust (what Edmondson described as “Psychological Safety”), and hence were more willing to disclose their mistakes. Edmondson’s findings were not new, but she brought a fresh spotlight to the link between a high trust environment and that of high performance.

Edmondson’s work has been backed up by study after study. In 2014 Google’s own project on what makes for high performing teams in their organisation found that Psychological Safety was a key determining factor for whether a team would perform well. Their research can be found on their rework site here.  Other organisations such as Netflix, who have often been praised for their ‘high performance culture’, actively promote the need to “share information openly, broadly, and deliberately”, and to be “extraordinarily candid with each other”.

The danger with the concept of Psychological Safety is that people assume it means a culture where you shouldn’t challenge people for risk of hurting feelings and their confidence. This is incorrect. It is about a high trust culture where you can be candid – and your candid feedback can be taken on in the constructive manner it was intended. It is about acknowledging that mistakes do happen and are necessary, but equally it should be about openly discussing how to then improve and avoid the mistake next time.

If your company wants to drive a high performance culture then the starting point should be to embrace a culture of Psychological Safety. Only with a company where people can raise their hand and ask questions without fear of reprisal - where they can be safely candid with one another - can continuous improvement and a drive for top performance be possible. This isn’t the only contributing factor to great performance, but it is as close to a silver bullet as you are likely to get.

Join Our
Newsletter

We never share your info. View our privacy policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join Our Amazing
Community
THere's More

Post You mIght Also Like

All Posts
Strategy & Transformation
Jun
22
//
2020

Culture trumps strategy every time

Digital Transformation is all the rage these days – as businesses try and deliver customer centric value to the market quicker than their competitors. However, it is often done without consideration for the cultural impact of these changes to your business. 
Strategy & Transformation
Jun
17
//
2020

Integrate LPM in Law Firms

Integrate Legal Project Management (LPM) in Law Firms
Agile & Product
Jun
12
//
2020

Running Scrum Remotely

It is well known that Agile and Scrum emphasize personal interaction and in person teamwork in a very organic and dynamic way. Most organisations will have in-flight projects that have been succeeding in their delivery since inception – based around these core Agile principles. You know these approaches will foster relationships and enable the work processes to naturally appear. You’re ready to facilitate your event calendar, to make sure everybody understands artefacts, events and roles, and to foster an Agile mindset. Suddenly the country shuts down, everyone is sent home and no date is set for when you will next see each other in person.
Agile & Product
Jun
4
//
2020

Not what – Why

When building a new product - too often it is easier to start with What, When and How rather than the Why.
People & Change
May
29
//
2020

Covid 19 – Life in lockdown and beyond

Covid 19 - Life in lockdown and beyond