Watch out for sub-optimising when seeking efficiency improvements

Post by 
Harry Vazanias
Published 
February 8, 2019
T

he biggest mistake many organisation make when seeking efficiency savings is to implement process and governance improvements that deliver efficiencies in one area which creating greater inefficiencies across the whole. This is called sub-optimising. For example, you could streamline the processes for one area by removing certain quality checks. This then leads to additional costs further down the food chain when another department has to deal with the knock-on effect of low quality.

Sub-optimising may sound like something that is easy to avoid given the example I have provided. However, sub-optimising can also occur when teams implement additional  processes and checks they believe will provide better results down-stream, and hence reduce costs. This is harder to spot, and is common in many organisations that are organised around functional silos that lack a deep understanding of one another or the end-to-end processes that cut across the silos.

For example, at one of our clients a new Proposition Team was introduced to improve the qualification of new demand for business changes and projects. The idea was that they could reduce costs by stopping certain unadvisable changes early, and better shape projects before they hit the project delivery function, thereby reducing FTE spent doing this on projects. The result over a couple of years was a sizeable increase in their delivery costs. To engage with the Proposition Team, other teams had to recruit new people. For example, the Operations Team, who looked after the live support of new business services, had to appoint two new relationship managers to engage with the Proposition Team.  Furthermore, the Proposition Team started to drive the capture of more demand for projects, leading to greater scoping work being needed. The Proposition Team also introduced new governance controls and forums, requiring people to spend more time engaging in these, and as a result, increasing the need for FTE across multiple teams. All this would be fine if the overall benefits outweighed the new costs, but there was a wide spread consensus that this was not the case. In a quest to optimise the demand intake process, the client had actually sub optimised the end-to-end process.

To prevent sub optimising, all efficiency improvement initiatives should focus on the end-to-end processes that cut across multiple teams and functional silos. This is what the likes of Lean and Systems Thinking have taught us, but which so many organisations miss despite the clear implications for the bottom line.

Join Our
Newsletter
Mailing List

We never share your info. View our privacy policy
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Join Our Amazing
Community
THere's More

Post You mIght Also Like

All Posts
Process Excellence
Jul
21
//
2022

People & Data – A Match Made in Heaven

Data has never been more valuable. It is used by organisations to showcase statistics and ‘real’ business insights, by taking away the subjective and biased nature of people’s opinions. Ultimately, data is now the true driver of change within organisations. Let’s be honest, there is no better way to spruce up a business case in the eyes of the Senior Leadership Team than stats, graphs and numbers!
People & Change
Apr
19
//
2022

Throwing the old rulebook out the window and writing a People & Culture Book from scratch

Strategy & Transformation
Feb
21
//
2022

How Effective Decision-Making is Key to Unlocking Your Transformation

In this article, Joe Taylor takes us through why effective decision making is key to a successful transformation and shares 5 top tips to help organisations and individuals by facilitating the path to an effective decision-making
Strategy & Transformation
Oct
15
//
2021

People are at the heart of any transformation

When organisations are considering an Op Model change, the people the change will affect need to be front and centre of all thinking related to the change. It is far too common for ‘the people’ to be considered too far along in the process, or not really considered at all. This leads to Op Models that fail because they are incompatible with the people required to actually make them work. So, how can we avoid this to happen?
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Jan
7
//
2021

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion - The 7 Step Approach

I don’t think anyone could have predicted the year we have had and I think most people will agree it has been pretty rubbish. The best thing to have come out of 2020 came from an absolute tragedy. The murder of George Floyd prompted emotion, demonstrations and conversations across the world. In turn it has made companies wake up and realise that we have to do better in aiming for better ethnic diversity in the workplace.